Archive for the history Category

Amhrán na bhFiann

Posted in Song, history with tags , , on February 4, 2008 by possecomitatus

THE IRISH NATIONAL ANTHEM

Sinne Fianna Fáil
Atá Fá gheall ag Éirinn
Buidhean dár sluagh tar rúinn do ráinig chughainn
Fámhoídh bheírh saor
Sean-tír ár sinnsear feasta
Ní fágfar fá’n tíorán ná fa’n tráil
Anocht a theigeamh sa bhearna baoghail
Le gean ar Gaedhí chun báis nó saoghail
Le gunna sgréach: Fá lamhach na piléar
Seo Libh canaidh amhrán na bhFiann

Seo dhibh a cháirde duan oglaidh
Caithréimeach, bríoghmhar, ceolmhar
Ár dteinte cnámh go buacach táid
‘S an spéir go min réaltógach
Is fionmhar faobhrach sinn chun gleo
‘S go tiúnmhar glé roimh tigheacht do’n ló
Fa ciúnas chaoimh na h-oidhche ar seol
Seo libh, canaídh amhrán na bhFiann

Cois banta réidhe, ar árdaibh sléibhe
Ba bhuadhach ár rinnsear romhainn
Ag lámhach go tréan fá’n sár- bhrat séin
Tá thuas sa ghaoith go seolta
Ba dhúthchas riamh d’ár gcine cháidh
Gan iompáil riar ó imirt áir
‘Siubhal mar iad i gcoinnibh rámhaid
Seo libh, canaidh amhrán na bhFiann

A buidhean nach fann d’fuil Ghaoidheal is Gall
Sinn breacadh lae na saoirse
Tá sgéimhle ’s sgannradh í gcroidhthibh namhad
Roimh ranngaibh laochra ár dtíre
Ár dteinte is tréith gan spréach anois
Sin luinne ghlé san spéir anoir
‘S an bíodhbha i raon na bpiléar agaibh
Seo libh, canaidh amhrán na bhFiann

[English translation]

A Soldier’s Song

We’ll sing a song, a soldier’s song
With cheering rousing chorus
As round our blazing fires we throng
The starry heavens o’er us
Impatient for the coming fight
And as we wait the morning’s light
Here in the silence of the night
We’ll chant a soldier’s song

Chorus:
Soldiers are we
whose lives are pledged to Ireland
Some have come
from a land beyond the wave
Sworn to be free
No more our ancient sire land
Shall shelter the despot or the slave
Tonight we man the gap of danger
In Erin’s cause, come woe or weal
‘Mid cannons’ roar and rifles peal
We’ll chant a soldier’s song

In valley green, on towering crag
Our fathers fought before us
And conquered ‘neath the same old flag
That’s proudly floating o’er us
We’re children of a fighting race
That never yet has known disgrace
And as we march, the foe to face
We’ll chant a soldier’s song

Chorus Repeat

Sons of the Gael! Men of the Pale!
The long watched day is breaking
The serried ranks of Inisfail
Shall set the Tyrant quaking
Our camp fires now are burning low
See in the east a silv’ry glow
Out yonder waits the Saxon foe
So chant a soldier’s song

Chorus Repeat

The Heritage Council Report on Tuam (3)

Posted in Tuam, history with tags , on November 29, 2007 by possecomitatus

4.0 History of Tuam
4.1 Earliest Origins

The earliest origins of Tuam are invariably associated with St Jarlath, or Iarlaith, who reputedly founded a monastery in the area. Little is known of him, but a legend describing his arrival is contained in the life of St Brendan of Clonfert. According to the legend, the wheel of his chariot broke in the area while travelling from his monastery of nearby Cloonfush, several miles to the east. This event had apparently been foretold by St Brendan to mark the spot upon which Jarlath would meet his death. Duly inspired, Jarlath established his monastic settlement here. The town of Tuam celebrates the occasion by using a chariot wheel as its symbol. According to Colgan, Jarlath eventually met his death in 540 AD, whereas Ware placed the apex of his life later in the 550’s. Whatever the case Jarlath may be placed in the early stages of Irish Christianity.

A more prosaic factor in the choice of location for the monastery is hinted in the name of Tuam, a shortened version of its older name Tuaim da Ghualainn, i.e. the mound of two shoulders. This probably refers to the high ground on either side of the River Nanny, overlooking a probable fording point over the River Nanny (or Corchra). The ford drew travellers from several different directions. St Jarlaths monastery, therefore, would have been close to a prominent feature of the landscape, and the focus of local interaction.

The political hegemony over this fording point and locale seems to have been exercised by the Conmaince in the 6th and 7th centuries. They were identified with the southern O’Neill, who dominated the high kingship of Ireland for five hundred years. The O’Neill rule appears to decline in the early part of the 10th-11th centuries in the face of the rise of Brian Boru and the Viking towns. The Vikings made their mark in Connacht as early as 835, no doubt striking terror into the local population in their avaricious quest for slaves and precious goods.

The instability paved the way for the O’Connor tribe, based in Cruachu, County Roscommon, to challenge for the control of the country. At the beginning of the 11th century, the O’Connors appear to have pushed the rival O’Flaherty family away from Tuam, and then constructed a fortress on the eastern banks of the Corchra River by 1049.

4.2 The O’Connors and the Rise of Tuam

The construction of a castle at Tuam marked a fundamental turning point both in the history of the O’Connors and the area. For reasons which are unclear, the O’Connors abandoned their historical homeland of Cruachu, replete with its ancient ceremonial sites, markets and fortresses and moved to Tuam, bringing with them all the paraphernalia of the Royal seat of one of the five provinces of Ireland. The existing monastery was therefore subject to considerable patronage and support by the O’Connors, and no doubt functioned as an important ceremonial centre for the leading members.

Consequently, Tuam became the political and ceremonial centre of Connacht. In 1111 it was named as one of the 5 episcopal sees of Ireland. In 1127 the lands around the monastery were extended and the great cross slab commissioned commemorating the genius of Tordealbahch O’Connor, and the abbot and bishop of Tuam, Aed O’hOssian. The monastery was crowned an Episcopal see in 1152 at the Synod of Kells. The endowments must be seen in the context of the aggrandisement of the O’Connors, particularly in the reign of Tordealbhach, whose career was characterised by constant warring and intrusions into the south and east of Ireland in a bid to underline his High Kingship of Ireland.

During his reign, and for possibly another 100 years after his death in 1156, Tuam acquired the familiar trappings of a medieval ecclesiastical town. The Augustinians established a priory in 1140, a new Cathedral was constructed in 1180’s, the church of Tempaill Jarlath was reconstructed in late Romanesque style, around the same time, and the Premonastasian Abbey of the Holy Trinity was in existence by 1204. For much of the 13th century, the O’Connors retained a strong military and political presence in Connacht and it was not until the defeat of Ruairi at the Battle of Athenry in 1316 that the Anglo-Norman Burkes finally destroyed them. Unlike many Irish towns therefore, Tuam’s origins are firmly rooted in the Gaelic world, albeit in its final flourish.

4.3 The Medieval Era and the decline of Tuam

The rise of Galway city, under the patronage of the Burkes, and the corresponding decline of the O’Connors, inevitably diverted resources from Tuam. It continued to function as the ecclesiastical capital of the province and the agricultural produce of its hinterland was no doubt traded there. Indeed, this commercial function was underlined by the charter of 1260 granted by Lord Edward, son of Henry III, and later to be Edward II, to

‘Thomas, Archbishop of Tuam and his successors, a yearly fair at his vill of Twem to last for eight days, namely on the feast of St Thomas the Martyr, and seven days following’.

The charter may have provided some short term prosperity but it did not prevent the long term decline. Many of the buildings of Tuam had been destroyed by fire in 1244, and for the following two and half centuries constant warfare and instability appear to have sapped it of any commercial initiative. In 1555 it was reported that the city of Tuam was by then ‘in ruins, unfortified, and almost uninhabited…’. Another account dated to 1561 observed that the local gentry used the very Cathedral itself as a fortress, and that there were by now only twenty or thirty houses in the town. The reformation appeared to have had little impact, and it was not until the arrival of Archbishop Lally in 1573 that Protestantism made its presence felt. Moreover, the status of archbishopric was threatened when it was proposed to transfer the Cathedral to Galway in the early years of the seventeenth century.

4.4 The Stuart & Georgian town and its revival

The drastic step of transferring the Cathedral thankfully never occurred. Instead, the archbishopric remained in the town, and the initiative of the Stuart monarchy stimulated growth. In 1613, it was granted borough status during the reign of James I, and in return two loyal protestant individuals were to be forwarded to the newly formed Irish Parliament in Dublin. The borough was comprised of a sovereign, twelve free burgesses, and the commonalty, but it was strangely devoid of any particular geographical limit. The borough and its parliamentary representatives appear to have overseen the establishment of the town as a commercial and trading centre. The population increased for much of the following two centuries and the pattern of streets characterising the towns’ centre probably took shape.

The revival continued apace in the following century, with the arrival of Archbishop Singe in 1716 (-1742) heralding a period of notable improvement. During his tenure, the town saw the laying out of the demesne and accompanying gardens, on either side of the River Nanny. The demesne was laid out in the English style of matching clumps of trees, water, and natural contours popularised by Launcelot Brown. Archbishop Singe was buried in 1742 in the grounds of the St Mary’s Cathedral. As a mark of respect, the shaft of the Market Cross was removed from the market place and set over his grave.

The loyal citizens of the borough also added value to the produce of their holdings and of the hinterland with the establishment of breweries, tanneries, tuck mills and gig mills. By the late eighteenth century Tuam was a prosperous, confident, provincial market town, and many of its finer buildings are testimony to this. Apart from the demesne, other notable additions to the town included the Bishop Street Bridge (1735), the Market House in Town Square (1780), and several other fine residences e.g. Waterslade.

4.5 The Tumultuous Nineteenth Century

The nineteenth century ushered in a period of more extensive and rapid change than seen previously. The recovery of the Catholic Church, the Famine, the extension of central government, and the rise of the political movements demanding national independence, all had demonstrable repercussions. The catholic revival began modestly with the establishment of St Jarlath’s College in 1800. The Catholic Free School was founded in 1816, and the construction of the new Catholic Cathedral began in 1823. The enormous presence of Archbishop McHale who arrived in 1834, remaining there until his death in 1881, overshadowed political and cultural life in the town.

The nationalistic outlook for which Archbishop McHale is chiefly remembered was greatly influenced by the encroachment of the British government in all areas of life. The creation of the Tuam Poor Law Union led to the construction of a workhouse on the Dublin Road. Other governmental agencies followed including the courthouse, the Bridewell, and the police barracks. The system of local government itself was reformed with the passing of the Municipal Corporations Act 1840. Tuam was therefore vested with 22 elected members of the Town Commission, the first of which elected a catholic chairman in November 1843.

By then Tuam, and the roads that snaked out of it, possessed over 6,000 inhabitants.  For the most part, they lived in mud cabins which stretched out from the town as far as Newtown Morris, up to Newgrove, or at least a mile down the roads leading to Galway and to Athenry. The population fell to 5,000 in 1851, as a consequence of the Famine and its accompanying emigration. Thereafter it experienced a decline of its populace. By 1911, the population fell to c.3,000 and has slowly recovered since then. By 1971, the population reached 4,900 and is presently c.5,600.

The towns business and trading prospects, however, generally improved in the aftermath of the Famine. The market was held every Wednesday and Saturday, in addition to twelve monthly fairs every year, attracting the produce of its extensive hinterland. Cattle, sheep, pigs, and wool appear to have been the mainstay of the markets. The town was linked by railway to Athenry in 1860 and, hence the larger cities.

4.6 The Modern Era

By the early part of the twentieth century Tuam was a thriving provincial town. Agriculture experienced a boom during the First World War and this undoubtedly benefited its merchants and traders. The valuation of Tuam rose by £2,000 between 1901 and 1919 to reach £5,450. In addition, it benefited from the planting of emigrants in its hinterland by the Congested Districts Board.

The new Irish State provided a sympathetic environment for the catholic institutions that went from strength to strength with new secondary schools, and enlarged religious establishments. Only in the very recent past has this trend abated. The Protestant Bishopric experienced a general decline culminating in the sale of its demesne to the town commissioners in 1952.

In the 1920’s serious efforts were made to clear the unsanitary hovels inhabited by the poorer citizens, and to rehouse the poorer families in more reasonable accommodation. Over 200 local authority houses were constructed by 1942. The establishment of the Sugar factory in 1934 provided employment for hundreds for several decades until its closure in 1987. The railway was closed for commercial traffic in 1973.

The buildings of Tuam emerged relatively unscathed from construction activity common in other parts of the country in the 1960’s and 70’s. The centre of the town retains its essentially eighteenth to nineteenth century building fabric and many of the roads preserve the scale and width of a bygone era, although the ever increasing traffic through the centre has had the effect of setting aside large open spaces for car parking. It is in the outskirts of the town where the recent improvements in the national economy are most marked, in the form of new housing estates, road improvements and industrial quarters. The challenge for the future, therefore, will be to retain the characteristic charm of the old town in the new economic and social environment.

The Heritage Council Report on Tuam (2)

Posted in Tuam, history with tags , on November 29, 2007 by possecomitatus

3.0 Baseline

3.1  Tuam is situated in a low lying area of north Galway County, 21 miles north of Galway City. The N17 national route links the town to Galway City to the south and Sligo, via Claremorris, to the north. Additional routes link it to Athenry and Ballyhaunis.

3.2  Tuam comprises the town and its environs. In 1996 the population of the town stood at 3,487 and 2,140 in the environs. The environs of Tuam forms the larger area and much of it has been set aside for residential development in line with county policy. Consequently it is anticipated that the population of the town and environs will reach 8,000 by 2004. Its hinterland of rich agricultural lands has an estimated population of 27,000.

3.3  A body of Town Commissioners, established in 1843, presently serves the town. For the purposes of planning however, the local authority is Galway County Council. The council is based in the city and has set out its policies and objectives in the 1998-2003 County Plan. The Tuam Town Plan 2000-2005 is set within the context of overall county policy. Significantly, Tuam has been earmarked for a diversion of  ‘resources’ from the city, including residential development. This is reflected in the Town Plan in the promotion of a policy of greater population density and large-scale land zoning for residential purposes.

3.4  The town lies south of an area of a particularly rich archaeological landscape comprising chiefly of several hundred ringforts, souterrains, and unclassified earthworks. The volume of monuments indicates the rich heritage of its hinterland, but their survival owes much to the relative isolation and lack of modern development in the region. There are 34 prehistoric monuments currently recorded within Tuam and environs.

3.5  The centre of the town has so far escaped the transformation brought about by urban renewal common elsewhere. The present spate of development is a recent phenomenon and the challenges facing the town in preserving its character and heritage are topical. This is also the case in the environs where the proposed zoning for residential purposes will inevitably place pressure on the integrity and preservation of the field monuments.

3.6 Tuam does not at present share the prestige and attractions of its sister Episcopal sees, Armagh, Cashel, and Kells. Its name does not have the associations of Kells. The evolution of the town from a monastic centre, to a modern town, is nevertheless a remarkable story and is of major heritage value. Much of the evolution can be observed in its morphology and layout. As in the case of the other sees, its origins lie within the realms of the Gaelic world, unlike the Anglo-Norman origins of many of the urban centres of the country as a whole.

The Heritage Council Report on Tuam (1)

Posted in Tuam, history with tags , on November 29, 2007 by possecomitatus

(Here: http://www.heritagecouncil.ie/publications/tuam/1.html )

1.0 – Objectives

The survey was commissioned by the Heritage Council as part of a series on four historic towns, Kells, Co Meath; Cashel, Co Tipperary; Thomastown, Co Kilkenny; and Tuam, Co Galway. The purpose of the survey was fourfold:

a)   To examine the effectiveness of the National Monuments Acts, Planning Acts, and current guidelines, and their implementation, in relation to the preservation and management of the archaeological and built heritage. In addition, to make recommendations on how they might be improved.

b) To examine the policies and development plans of the statutory and local authorities and assess whether these provide optimum conditions for the preservation, recording, and management of the archaeological and built heritage. In addition, to make recommendations on how they might be improved.

c) To examine the effectiveness of the town development plan using the heritage appraisal of development plans methodology developed by the Heritage Council. Make recommendations on how the development plan might be improved.

d) To identify what, if any, features unique to Tuam, require a revised approach to archaeology and the built heritage in a planning and development context. The study will also consider how effective any earlier archaeological interventions have been.
1.1 Introduction

1.2 The case of Tuam is vital in that it comprises a particularly significant urban centre. Tuam owes its origins to the Gaelic civilisation preceding the Anglo-Norman invasion and the outline of its streets and lanes indicate a much older civilisation than that normally associated with the founding of Irish towns and cities. The outlines are partly ecclesiastical and partly secular in character, but they share a common fragility when faced with modern urban development. Alterations to plot sizes and site assembly erode the character of older urban centres. Modern construction technology is disproportionately powerful and destructive within the context of buildings and structures.

1.3 Tuam did not undergo the same level of urban renewal experienced in many other Irish towns in the 1990’s but the recent Galway County Plan and Tuam Town Plan both envisage increasing population and development in the town and its environs. The level of the proposed development will inevitably put pressure on the existing fabric.

1.4 The following survey will therefore consider both the archaeological and the historical architecture of Tuam. In an urban context both disciplines are the two sides of the one coin, since the character of a town is informed by both. It is perhaps unfortunate that the responsibilities of the archaeological heritage and built environment are largely catered for in different types of legislation, the National Monuments Acts and the Planning Acts. A highly centralised authority underpins the former, whereas the Planning Acts have traditionally sought to refer to local opinion for their operation. The consolidation of the Department of Arts, Culture, the Gaeltacht & the Islands has brought some of the functions together, but it remains to be seen if this will introduce coherent implementation of the legislation.

1.5 The state has been active in introducing an extensive range of legislation dealing with the built heritage in the last decade. A comprehensive and radical policy on built environment is now rooted in the Planning & Development Act 2000. It allows for considerable intervention on the part of the state and local authorities. The real effects of the legislation will no doubt be borne out over the coming years.

1.6 The purpose of this project therefore is to highlight issues of particular significance to Tuam, its character and its heritage. The recommendations that follow are based on a scrutiny of its history and existing characteristics, and the experience of planning there. It is hoped that the recommendations are realistic and capable of being implemented. The recommendations are primarily concerned with local government policies and objectives, although there are some suggested improvements to the legislation and to its implementation. The purpose of the report is to encourage the greater sophistication of urban policy rather than any radical change of direction.

1.7 The focus of attention of this study is on the outlines of early ecclesiastical enclosures, as reflected in the lanes and streets of the town, and on the open spaces that previously provided ground for the fairs and markets held in the town since it was established. As we will see, the legislative provisions, and the local policies protecting monuments may not be adequate in preserving what are in essence fragile urban features. Curved streets, narrow lanes, small plots, open yards, and privately held green spaces are subject to developmental pressures regularly. The loss of the particular is a recurring feature of modern urban development. The purpose of the project therefore is to make a case for some particular features, remnants of an earlier era, fragile yet valuable.